"We are grateful everyday
for our small successes..."
- Cilette Swann
(Gypsy Soul)
"..we
thought it would
be rewarding to pay homage to some of the writers and artists who've
inspired us along the way."
-
Cilette Swann
(Gypsy Soul)
"You
still want people to be able to sing along, but half
the fun of covering a well-known song is adding some of your spice and
personality to the mix."
- Cilette Swann
(Gypsy Soul)
"We
LOVE to play live and it really is where you can hear the essence of
who we are as performers."
- Roman Morykit
(Gypsy Soul)
"...it
still always comes down to the songs and the performances. Always."
- Roman Morykit
(Gypsy Soul)
"I see the
songs as landscapes."
- Roman Morykit
(Gypsy Soul)
"We are
quite different live than we
are on record and that's how we want to keep it."
- Roman Morykit
(Gypsy Soul)
"We
plan to keep making the best music we can in hopes of reaching
global audiences."
- Cilette Swann
(Gypsy Soul)
Roman Morykit & Cilette
Swann (Gypsy Soul)
Some artists have momentum -- an undeniable forward motion, pushing them
to something greater. For Gypsy Soul, the duo of vocalist Cilette Swann
and multi-instrumentalist/producer Roman Morykit, I see their momentum
leading to an exceedingly bright future. Not that their past has been
all that shabby. Here's a group that has produced eight CD's (their
most recent beingBeneath The
Covers: A Rediscovery)
which have sold more 100,000 copies independently. They've had over 1.5
million downloads on MP3.com garnering ten #1 songs. Their music has
been on hit TV shows such as: Providence,
Felicity,
Roswell,
The
Young & The Restless, MTV Specials
and Movies
of the Week. The films Quick Sand
(with Michael Kane) and After Sex
(with Brooke Shields) both featured Gypsy Soul music. Cilette and Roman
also wrote the theme song for Japan's Wow-Wow
TV show. And they've opened for Grammy Winners, Larry Klein and Tony
Childs and CMA Winner Beth Neilsen-Chapman.
But what's equally impressive to me is the fact this duo has no problem
rolling up their sleeves. Check out Cilette's quote from their bio:
"For years in the western states, we'd book ourselves at Art and Wines
Festivals, set up our booth with a P.A. and just play for 8-10 hours. We
made listening stations so people could hear the CD's and everyone just
loved that we were out there promoting ourselves." I think the next
time a new artist asks me how to get the ball rolling, I'm going to tell
them to take a look at Gypsy Soul. They do it right.
The title of Gypsy Soul's latest release, Beneath The
Covers: A Rediscovery,
pretty much says exactly what this record is about. If you're like me
and you're into songs by artists like U2, The Beatles and Daniel Lanois,
you'll love BTC:AR.
Their cover of “Nights In White Satin” is a real
standout
– Gypsy Soul truly put their own mark on this Moody Blues classic. But BTC:AR
isn't solely about other artist's songs; it's also about Gypsy Soul's
own music. In fact, three of the album's ten
songs are original tracks that were rediscovered during the recording of the project. It's a testament to the quality of
Cilette and Roman's writing that the tracks blend so seamlessly with
the covers.
To learn more about Cilette, Roman and Gypsy Soul, please visit GypsySoul.com Jamie:
Your most recent album, Beneath
The Covers: A Rediscovery,
is a collection of covers songs. Why did you choose to do a cover
record? And secondly, what drew you to these particular songs?
Cilette:
When we were in the planning stages of our latest CD, we wanted to do
something completely different and fresh. As writers, our CDs are
usually 95% our own material with the occasional cover. Nearing our
10th year as Gypsy Soul and starting on our 8th CD, we thought it would
be rewarding to pay homage to some of the writers and artists who've
inspired us along the way.
Initially, it was tough to narrow down the choices until we devised
some criteria. We could have easily made Beneath the
Covers
Vol. 20 as there are so many incredible songs out there. Even a number
of our fans sent in amazing and surprising suggestions. However, we
decided that in order for this CD to really work, both Roman and I had
to have a deep, emotional connection to the songs and/or artists we
were choosing. We grew up on different continents with diverse musical
influences, but somehow our tastes are strangely similar. Like Peter
Gabriel, Daniel Lanois, U2, Sam Cooke, Eva Cassidy, Led Zeppelin, Cold
Play, Emmy Lou Harris, Radio Head, Richard Ashcroft (The Verve) to name
a few... we both love these artists.
I was heavily influenced by Celtic and African music as kid of S.
African/ Irish background, but I also loved more American styles like
Gospel, Blues and Acoustic Singer/Songwriters growing up. Roman was
raised in the UK and although drawn to the quirkier British
groups/artists including David Bowie, he also had a great affinity for
Americana, Blues and Funk. There has always been a common thread in our
musical influences and tastes even though we were raised thousands of
miles apart. We truly are Gypsy Soul Mates! Our love of music, culture
and travel is what bonds us.
We also thought it would be very entertaining to record only male
vocally orientated songs. Although we did record Stevie Nicks'
“Landslide” (okay, she has a boy's name, so that
was close)
it did not make the cut for the North American release (we'll save it
for iTunes or the like). So in the end, all the cover songs on the CD
were originally sung by men. I especially loved the challenge of
communicating the emotion and soul of these songs from a female (vocal)
perspective.
While reworking all of these artist’s songs, we started to
think
about our own songs in a different way. While touring we starting
playing around with the arrangements of our older songs and ended up
re-recording Lovin Me that made the CD. We were also encouraged to add
a couple of our brand new songs, "Silver Lining" and "One Thing"....
both
about rediscovering one's self and one's spirit.
Jamie: I can definitely hear
a "deep, emotional connection" to the tunes you chose for Beneath The
Covers: A Rediscovery.
What I can also hear is your own unique take on the those songs. Was it
a challenge for you to retain your own identity working with such
strong material?
Cilette: Roman's
approach when re-arranging a cover is quite interesting. He will only
listen to the original once or sometimes not at all and just go from
memory. It is pretty amazing really. You can play something to him once
and he's pretty much got it down. We never want to be too influenced by
the original. We want to tap into the essence of the song but create
our own vibe and own interpretation. Sometimes, Roman will hint at a
familiar lick or theme, but he always takes that arrangement/production
to a different place. It is a fine balance for us trying to respect the
original song's integrity, yet wanting to communicate our own emotions
about the song.
I will usually see where Roman has taken the song and go from there as
far as my vocal melodies. When I approach a cover, I will try to retain
familiarity for the audiences who love the melody, but float, twist and
bend the lines in a way I feel I can best express the
writer’s
sentiments. You still want people to be able to sing along, but half
the fun of covering a well-known song is adding some of your spice and
personality to the mix. After all, isn’t the creative life
all
about individuality and expression? Often times we might even add a new
intro or a little section that didn't exist in the original, as on
"Blackbird" and "Don't Give Up".
The material we chose was most certainly strong, even epic. Initially,
we were a little apprehensive that people might not understand this CD.
But for us the purpose was to pay homage to artists/writers/songs that
have become a part of us and from them, we’ve grown as
artists.
We just wanted to share that admiration with our audience. We've
absolutely been thrilled with the reactions so far. Hopefully, BTC:AR will be
embraced by an international audience who appreciate what we've done.
Jamie: In listening to
both Beneath
The
Covers: A Rediscovery and your previous album, Superstition
Highway,
I find the way you approach your vocal lines and manner in which Roman
produces are perfectly matched and clear. To my ears, you never step on
each other's musical toes! Is this ability to blend something that
comes easily to you two?
Roman:
Thank you for the compliment!
Actually, it has always been something that we have done which was one
of the reasons that we started working together. My approach to
production has always been to showcase the vocal lines and voice and I
always try to arrange the instruments to achieve that. When you have a
voice as strong as Cilette's, you want it to be up in the mix so people
can hear it. But by the same token, to also add interesting textures
with the instruments to create the landscape upon which Cilette's voice
is the feature. When we are first working on a song, we play them out
live as much as possible to get the blend just right, even though one
tends to play more in a live environment. When we get to the studio,
you always have to simplify the parts but the feel is now established
and I go about reinforcing that with the choice of arrangement and
instruments.
Jamie: And
I was just going to ask you about the connection between your records
and your live show! One of the things that strikes me when listening to
your albums is how well I feel the arrangements would work in a live
setting. From looking at your extensive performance
schedule,
clearly live music is important to Gypsy Soul as a band and, as you
say, helps to define the production of your records. Do you feel the
inverse is also true? Does your recorded music change the way you
approach your live show?
Roman: Our
live performances are the most integral part of what is Gypsy Soul. We
LOVE to play live and it really is where you can hear the essence of
who we are as performers. The challenge in the studio is to capture
that energy onto record. For the most part, all the performances that
you hear on the record, are one take. Even though I'm working in a
medium where one can piece together a performance from multiple takes
as is the case with Pro Tools, I rarely do so with Gypsy Soul. Cilette
is so good that she can nail the performance in the first or second
take. She usually sings the song three to four times and the first or
second take is usually the best. I may drop in a couple of lines if I
like the way she sung something on another track but for the most part
I try to stick to one performance as you can feel the difference in one
performance over a track with multiple takes.
For instance, the vocal on "Wicked Game" was the guide vocal, but it
was so good that when we came to redo it with the "final version" there
was something so special about that take that we just left it alone.
The same thing happened with "Superstition". When I am recording my
parts, I do the same thing. It's always just easier for me to just play
the part in one until it feels right, rather than piece the parts
together. I guess I'm old school that way. I'm so used to having to get
it right as it was harder to punch in when you were using tape.
As for the recorded music changing our live performances; I would have
to say that it probably doesn't. We often re-arrange the songs live
differently from the recorded versions. There is still enough of the
record there, but we definitely play with the arrangements more.
Jamie: You
use a wide range of guitar textures in your arrangements. Everything
from acoustics to electrics, slide guitar to what I think is an E-Bow
on "Who?". So for the interest of all the guitar geeks out there
(myself included!) could you talk a bit about your guitars and how you
record them?
Roman: Probably
the easiest way to answer this is to run through the guitars that I
use. For the acoustic, I have my very favorite guitar which is a Santa
Cruz OMPWM. It's design is that of a pre war concert Martin and it's
hand made using all antique woods. You really hear it's tone showcased
on tracks like "I Still Haven't Found", "Loving Me" and "Superstition".
The other acoustic I use is a dreadnought Tacoma. It wasn't a
particularly expensive guitar but just has the hugest sound that I have
ever heard on an acoustic; lots of bottom end but a really nice clarity
too. You can hear it's tone on "Country Roads" and "Still Water". As
for the resonator, I have a vintage Dobro which has a nickel plated
brass body. I always blend the sound from the DI and Mic with the
acoustics and Dobro and use very little eq, only cutting a little of
the bottom end and adding some sparkle at 15k. I try and get the sound
as close as possible with the mic placement and blending both the DI
and mic signals. I always use a high pass filter on the mic at either
80 or 75 hz.
As for the electrics, it will probably amuse you to know that I use an
old POD as the "amp"! The thing that I have found that really makes the
POD work well is to use a pre-amp before it. I have a cheap DOD pre-amp
pedal but it has this great tone knob as well as the level control that
adds an incredible depth to the tone. I also really mix and match the
amps and cabs in the POD and by the time you have the guitar in the
mix, you can't tell that it wasn't recorded using an real amp. Now, if
I was recording some really heavy guitar rock, I would definitely use
amps as that's a different thing. But for Gypsy Soul it's more about
the textures and parts rather than that wall of sound. So it works
well. I also do have a VOX AC15 and Fender Pro Junior as well when I
need to mic an amp.
My main axes are a 70's Tele Deluxe and a reissue Danelectro with
lipstick pickups. I also use an old 80's Japanese Strat with Texas
Specials on it for a lot of the glassy parts. And yes, that was an
E-Bow on "Who". Love that thing for those high soaring notes! And I
also have a 12 string Danelectro that I sometimes use for melody parts.
As for the bass, that's a custom made US Masters Guitar Works Fretless
that they made for me with some unusual eq settings that are specific
to my style as I incorporate a lot of harmonics in the bass lines.
I have the weirdest collection of mic pre's, none of which cost more
than $1500.00. I mostly use an old TL Audio where I switched out the
tubes with Bell E85's ( I think!?) and a ProVLA tube compressor which I
usually use for the Mic. As for mic's: it depends. I usually use large
diaphram mic like a Sure KSM27 or a Studio Projects U87. I have a Joe
Meek VC1Q channel strip which I often use for the acoustic DI. Love the
compressor on that! A couple of Studio Project $200 mic-pre's, a Eureka
(mostly for the bass) and a DBX 160 compressor. It all
depends on
the sound that I'm looking for.
It's so easy to get caught up in the equipment and wanting to buy and
upgrade to the most current "new thing", and I have been guilty of that
in the past. It's a cliche, but I've found that if the songs and/or
parts aren't there or the performances suck, it doesn't make any
difference how expensive the equipment is that you record it on; it'll
will only ever sound like expensive crap. Of course, there's definitely
an expectation these days for the overall quality of the recording
being good, but even that can be achieved by using ProTools Digi 002
(which is what I use) instead of ProTools HD. All that being said, it
still always comes down to the songs and the performances. Always.
Jamie: Couldn't
agree more... I have to be honest, I'm surprised by your gear list. I
thought for sure you were recording on some seriously high end
equipment -- your records sound completely top-notch. I guess the old
saying about it not being about what you have but how you use it
applies here. And by the way, I love the POD, so I'm going to have to
try your suggestion of using a preamp before it.
I'd like to ask you about your writing/composing process. Do you have a
set way or manner of writing (i.e. music first/lyrics first)? Do you,
for instance, set aside a specific time for composing?
Roman: The
songs usually start with the music first and then the lyrics. We are
also both writing all the time and have a catalogue of ideas that we're
adding to. For me, it usually starts when I'm just sitting down to play
the guitar or bass. Sometimes I'm inspired and a bunch of ideas and
themes come to me which I then will develop into some kind of
"structure" and if I like that, I will play it for Cilette. If she's
inspired by it, an idea for a lyrical theme may come to her, or she may
go into her "idea box" and pull out a lyric that she's started that may
work with the musical feel. We've written a lot of songs that way. More
often these days, I'll be playing the guitar and Cilette will come over
to me because something catches her ear, and we'll work on an idea
together, and that's the best. For example, we wrote "One More Day"
like that. On a few occasions, Cilette will have a lyric that I then
put music to. We have a writing rule though. After we have worked on a
song idea it has to pass "The Morning After Test", which basically
means it has to make you feel the same way the next day as it did when
you were caught up in the high of the idea process.
I always know when I've hit on something because I'll be playing an
idea and suddenly the whole feel of the song will come into my head
including the parts. I arrange the tracks in my head before I even
record the first note, as it's a very visual process for me. I see the
songs as landscapes. I may have some of the parts and themes done but I
also know what I want the feel of the other parts to be, if not all of
the notes. Then, when I'm playing along with the recorded tracks I know
what I'm looking for until I hit that "thing" that just makes you lose
yourself.
Cilette nearly always starts with her vocal melody and as she's working
on that, she may have an idea for a theme for the lyric. Then she'll
just let's it sit in the back of her mind, or I will record a basic
guitar track for her, and she'll listen and sing along with it until it
gets under her skin. Then most or all of the lyric will just come to
her. She'll usually have to refine it as she fits it to the vocal
melody or song. And often we'll be working on an idea together and
whole chunks of a lyric will come to her.
Jamie: With
eight records (I'm guessing 80 + songs) under your belt you certainly
have a lot of leeway in terms of your set lists. How do you choose
which songs to play live? How many songs do you keep in your active
repertoire?
Roman: We
have about 44-55 in our active repertoire, depending on what time of
year it is, as we have a couple of Holiday CDs too. There are some
songs that we always play like, "Who", "One More Day" and strangely
enough, "Amazing Grace". These and others are staples that fans expect
us to play at virtually every show. Then we'll chose others depending
on the type and energy of the event. We usually have a rough idea of a
set list and we really decide on the songs that we are going to play on
the fly, depending on how the energy of the audience feels to us. As I
may have already mentioned, we really like to play around with the live
arrangements so even if we are playing a familiar song, it's probably
going to be different from a previous gig where someone heard the same
song! We also decide on which ones we are going to play depending how
many players we have with us as some songs sound better with a band
than with just the duo.
Jamie: I was just looking at
your "live in concert" photos.
From the looks of it, your band is always evolving. At times, you have
a drummer with you, at other times a percussionist. Sometimes there's a
trumpet player or a second guitarist. And you seem to be switching up
instruments (moving between guitar and bass) too. What draws you to
playing in so many different configurations?
Roman: Keeping
the live shows as interesting for both the audience and ourselves, as
we can! We never want to become one of those artists that "mail in" a
performance. It's incredibly important to us to give a great show and
to make it interesting for the audience and to show our appreciation to
them for coming out to support us! We are quite different live than we
are on record and that's how we want to keep it. If you just want to
hear a carbon copy of the record when we play live, then stay at home
and listen to the record. It's going to sound different, and hopefully
just as good or better. Most people say that they prefer the live
experience as there is a different energy. When it's just the two of
us, we'll break down songs to just guitar and voice or fretless bass
and voice. I also use a loop station and make rhythm tracks that I then
play along with. And if we have have other musicians with us, we'll do
different arrangements to fit with the instruments that we have. As for
me switching instruments; the fretless bass is really my first
instrument, so any chance that I get, I try to arrange a tune so that I
can play it!
Jamie: Knowing
that the fretless bass is your first instrument makes me feel a little
better. I'm trying to get my head and hands around a fretless guitar I
picked up a little while ago called a Glissentar. It's an 11 string
fretless nylon guitar made by Godin. It's a great instrument, but still
haven't totally got the pitch/intonation down. How the heck do you stay
so in tune? Any tips you could give me?
Roman: Fretless
guitar.. wow!! That's entirely too many strings to keep track of!...
and 11 of them at that! You're a braver man than I! I'm a
traditionalist and only play a four string, mainly because I can't
count past four.
I can sum it up in one word; practice. There's no easy way to do it. I
think that you have to really become familiar with the instrument, but,
treat it like a completely NEW instrument. I play fretless bass not
bass. They are very different instruments with different approaches.
Just because you play bass, doesn't mean you can play fretless bass,
and vice versa. You have to "feel" the notes with a fretless, and not
get completely paranoid about tuning, but at the same time, it does
have to be in tune. Sounds like an oxymoron, I know, but that's the
best way that I can describe the process. For that reason, I don't like
fretless basses with lines (or "training wheels", as a good friend
describes them) as you spend your time fixated on keeping your fingers
exactly on the lines, with the occasional slide, which ends up sounding
like a fretted bass. They're supposed to sound wide; that's what gives
them character. But they're still supposed to be in tune. Now, when
you've got that under control, then start adding more notes for
chords.. Then the fun really starts!
Jamie: Oh,
the dreaded "P" word. I guess it really does always come back to
that... Thanks for giving me a few ideas to try out. I think you're
absolutely right about fretless instruments -- I'm going to start
trying to think of my fretless guitar as a completely unique instrument.
So what's next for Gypsy Soul? Do you guys have any long term goals for
the band?
Cilette: Long term
goals...hummm. That’s a potent question!
We plan to keep making the best music we can in hopes of reaching
global audiences. We want to perform in the most beautiful places in
the world with a diverse line up of the most gifted musicians we can
find. We both have a deep affinity for travel and embracing different
cultures. So the possibility of expanding our international touring to
places like South Africa, more of Europe and Asia is extremely exciting
for us. As our foreign licensing opportunities grow over the next few
years, it will allow us the freedom to tour in countries where the
promotional ground-work has been laid and audiences have some
familiarity with our work.
In addition, we both feel that one can always improve at their craft
and speaking for myself, I intend to broaden my lyrical scope and am
always searching for new methods to strengthen my voice and body for
longevity. We both also love giving workshops for music and art
students at colleges and universities. Not having kids of our own (at
least not the two legged kind) doing the seminars/workshops is
incredibly gratifying. It is amazing how much we learn from the
students. We try to impart a real sense of possibility knowing that
when you're just starting out in the music business, there are a lot of
pitfalls and heartaches. We hope in sharing our experiences that
perhaps we can help to inspire some creative and exciting approaches
and help the students to avoid as much anguish as possible.
We are grateful everyday for our small successes and being able to make
our living solely from music for the last decade as Gypsy Soul. It
certainly would be lovely to believe that the next ten and twenty years
will continue to bring more opportunities to share our music globally,
to participate in innovative new collaborations and to choose music and
film projects that deeply inspire us. There's never a shortage of ideas
or desires between us. The challenge is trying to fit it all into the
24 hours we've been given each day and learning to strike a healthy
balance between our creative time, the daily business, touring and
personal time. Now, that's the hard part.
Jamie: Thanks Cilette and
Roman -- this has been a great conversation! Best of luck in the future
and let's stay in touch!